Sudokus and bimagic squares
See also
Sudoku's French ancestors
The Sudoku game has become a great success everywhere on the planet, mainly since 2005. The link between latin squares and Sudokus has oftenly been remarked, but it seems that the link between bimagic squares and Sudokus has never been remarked.
Gaston Tarry
(Villefranche de Rouergue 1843 - Le Havre 1913)
In 1900, Gaston Tarry was the first to prove the famous problem of the 36 officers asked by Euler in 1782: it is impossible to arrange a delegation of six regiments (each of which sending a colonel, a lieutenant-colonel, a major, a captain, a lieutenant, and a sub-lieutenant) in a 6x6 array such that no row or column duplicates a rank or a regiment. Tarry has also invented a marvelous method for the construction of multimagic squares : the first paper written by Tarry on his method was presented by Henri Poincaré in the Comptes-Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, 1906. We can find details of his method, with numerous constructions of 8x8 and 9x9 bimagic squares using it, in the General Cazalas's book published in 1934, method slightly enhanced by Cazalas. And the Viricel-Boyer method used for our tetramagic and pentamagic squares, fully described in my article published in Pour La Science in 2001, is greatly inspired by the Tarry-Cazalas method.
Now the main information: ALL the 9x9 bimagic squares constructed with the Tarry-Cazalas method are a combination of 2 Sudokus!
Here are two Sudokus (each 3x3 subsquare contains the nine integers from 1 to 9, and each row and each column contains the nine integers from 1 to 9):
|
Sudoku A |
|
Sudoku B |
||||||||||||||||
|
2 |
5 |
8 |
1 |
4 |
7 |
3 |
6 |
9 |
2 |
9 |
4 |
6 |
1 |
8 |
7 |
5 |
3 |
|
|
1 |
4 |
7 |
3 |
6 |
9 |
2 |
5 |
8 |
7 |
5 |
3 |
2 |
9 |
4 |
6 |
1 |
8 |
|
|
3 |
6 |
9 |
2 |
5 |
8 |
1 |
4 |
7 |
6 |
1 |
8 |
7 |
5 |
3 |
2 |
9 |
4 |
|
|
8 |
2 |
5 |
7 |
1 |
4 |
9 |
3 |
6 |
9 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
8 |
6 |
5 |
3 |
7 |
|
|
7 |
1 |
4 |
9 |
3 |
6 |
8 |
2 |
5 |
5 |
3 |
7 |
9 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
8 |
6 |
|
|
9 |
3 |
6 |
8 |
2 |
5 |
7 |
1 |
4 |
1 |
8 |
6 |
5 |
3 |
7 |
9 |
4 |
2 |
|
|
5 |
8 |
2 |
4 |
7 |
1 |
6 |
9 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
9 |
8 |
6 |
1 |
3 |
7 |
5 |
|
|
4 |
7 |
1 |
6 |
9 |
3 |
5 |
8 |
2 |
3 |
7 |
5 |
4 |
2 |
9 |
8 |
6 |
1 |
|
|
6 |
9 |
3 |
5 |
8 |
2 |
4 |
7 |
1 |
8 |
6 |
1 |
3 |
7 |
5 |
4 |
2 |
9 |
|
These Sudokus have nice supplemental properties, i.e. if we move one or more columns from one side to the opposite side, they remain Sudokus: the new 3x3 sub-squares contains again all the integers from 1 to 9. Same if we move rows from one side to the opposite side.
Now, construct a 9x9 square in which each cell use the two cells of Sudokus A and B with the formula:
|
9(A - 1) + B |
Then you get a bimagic square constructed with the Tarry-Cazalas method!
|
11 |
45 |
67 |
6 |
28 |
62 |
25 |
50 |
75 |
|
7 |
32 |
57 |
20 |
54 |
76 |
15 |
37 |
71 |
|
24 |
46 |
80 |
16 |
41 |
66 |
2 |
36 |
58 |
|
72 |
13 |
38 |
55 |
8 |
33 |
77 |
21 |
52 |
|
59 |
3 |
34 |
81 |
22 |
47 |
64 |
17 |
42 |
|
73 |
26 |
51 |
68 |
12 |
43 |
63 |
4 |
29 |
|
40 |
65 |
18 |
35 |
60 |
1 |
48 |
79 |
23 |
|
30 |
61 |
5 |
49 |
74 |
27 |
44 |
69 |
10 |
|
53 |
78 |
19 |
39 |
70 |
14 |
31 |
56 |
9 |
This square is bimagic:
And it has supplemental bimagic properties:
You can get another bimagic square using the other formula:
|
9(B - 1) + A |
Of course, all couples of Sudokus do not give a bimagic square, and all bimagic squares (those not constructed by the Tarry-Cazalas method) are not coming from a couple of Sudokus. For example the first 9x9 bimagic square published by G. Pfeffermann cannot be constructed by the Tarry-Cazalas method, meaning that it is not a combination of 2 Sudokus.
As we have seen above, Gaston Tarry is well-known for his proof of the 36 officer problem of Euler, and for his construction method of multimagic squares. But also:
Return to the home page http://www.multimagie.com